human genetics Influence of the environmentbiology

As stated earlier in this article, gene expression occurs only after modification by the environment. A good example is the recessively inherited disease called galactosemia, in which the enzyme necessary for the metabolism of galactose—a component of milk sugar—is defective. The sole source of galactose in the infant’s diet is milk, which in this instance is toxic. The treatment of this most serious disease in the neonate is to remove all natural forms of milk from the diet (environmental manipulation) and to substitute a synthetic milk lacking galactose. The infant will then develop normally but will never be able to tolerate foods containing lactose. If milk were not a major part of the infant’s diet, however, the mutant gene would never be able to express itself, and galactosemia would be unknown.

Another way of saying this is that no trait can exist or become actual without an environmental contribution. Thus, the old question of which is more important, heredity or environment, is without meaning. Both nature (heredity) and nurture (environment) are always important for every human attribute.

But this is not to say that the separate contributions of heredity and environment are equivalent for each characteristic. Dark pigmentation of the iris of the eye, for example, is under hereditary control in that one or more genes specify the synthesis and deposition in the iris of the pigment (melanin). This is one character that is relatively independent of such environmental factors as diet or climate; thus, individual differences in eye colour tend to be largely attributable to hereditary factors rather than to ordinary environmental change.

On the other hand, it is unwarranted to assume that other traits (such as height, weight, or intelligence) are as little affected by environment as is eye colour. It is very easy to gather information that tall parents tend, on the average, to have tall children (and that short parents tend to produce short children), properly indicating a hereditary contribution to height. Nevertheless, it is equally manifest that growth can be stunted in the environmental absence of adequate nutrition. The dilemma arises that only the combined, final result of this nature–nurture interaction can be directly observed. There is no accurate way (in the case of a single individual) to gauge the separate contributions of heredity and environment to such a characteristic as height. An inferential way out of this dilemma is provided by studies of twins.