Remember me
A-Z Browse

star Nearest starsastronomy

General considerations » Distances to the stars » Nearest stars

The table lists information about the 20 nearest known stars. Only three stars, Alpha Centauri, Procyon, and Sirius, appear both in this table and in the table of the 20 brightest stars. Ironically, most of the relatively nearby stars are dimmer than the Sun and are invisible without the aid of a telescope. By contrast, some of the well-known bright stars outlining the constellations have parallaxes as small as the limiting value of 0.001″ and are therefore well beyond several hundred light-years distance from the Sun. The most luminous stars can be seen at great distances, whereas the intrinsically faint stars can be observed only if they are relatively close to Earth.

The 20 nearest stars
name visual magnitude* and spectral type distance in light-years** visual luminosity relative to the Sun
A*** B***     A***       B***
Proxima Centauri 11.01 M5.5 Ve   4.2 0.00005
Alpha Centauri (A and B only) 0.00 G2 V 1.35 K1 V   4.4 1.41 0.405
Barnard’s star 9.54 M5 V   5.9 0.00039
Wolf 359 13.46 M6.5 Ve   7.8 0.00002
BD +36 2147 7.49 M2 V   8.3 0.00506
Sirius –1.44 A1 V 8.44 DA 2   8.6 20.2 0.00226
Luyten 726-8 12.56 M5.5 Ve 12.96 M5.5 Ve   8.7 0.00005 0.00004
Ross 154 10.37 M3.6 Ve   9.7 0.00049
Ross 248 12.27 M5.5 Ve 10.3 0.0001
Epsilon Eridani 3.72 K2 V 10.5 0.26
CD –36 15693 7.35 M2 V 10.7 0.00961
Ross 128 11.12 M4 V 10.9 0.00031
Luyten 789-6 12.32 M5 Ve 11.2 0.00011
61 Cygni 5.20 K5 V 6.05 K7 V 11.4 0.0784 0.0358
Procyon 0.40 F5 IV-V 10.70 DZ 11.4 6.54 0.0005
BD +59 1915 8.94 M3.4 V 11.5 0.00257
BD +43 44 8.09 M2 V 11.10 M4 V 11.6 0.00571 0.00036
Gliese 51-15 14.81 M6.5 Ve 11.8 0.00001
Epsilon Indi 4.69 K4 Ve 11.8 0.135
Tau Ceti 3.49 G8 V 11.9 0.413
*Negative magnitudes are brightest, and one magnitude difference corresponds to a difference in brightness of 2.5 times; e.g., a star of magnitude –1 is 10 times brighter than one of magnitude 1.5.
**One light-year equals about 9.46 trillion km.
***A and B are brighter and fainter components, respectively, of star.

Although the lists of the brightest and the nearest stars pertain to only a very small number of stars, they nonetheless serve to illustrate some important points. The stars listed fall roughly into three categories: (1) giant stars and supergiant stars having sizes of tens or even hundreds of solar radii and extremely low average densities—in fact, several orders of magnitude less than that of water (one gram per cubic centimetre); (2) dwarf stars having sizes ranging from 0.1 to 5 solar radii and masses from 0.1 to about 10 solar masses; and (3) white dwarf stars having masses comparable to that of the Sun but dimensions appropriate to planets, meaning that their average densities are hundreds of thousands of times greater than that of water.

These rough groupings of stars correspond to stages in their life histories (see below Later stages of evolution). The second category is identified with what is called the main sequence (see below Hertzsprung-Russell diagram) and includes stars that emit energy mainly by converting hydrogen into helium in their cores. The first category comprises stars that have exhausted the hydrogen in their cores and are burning hydrogen within a shell surrounding the core. The white dwarfs represent the final stage in the life of a typical star, when most available sources of energy have been exhausted and the star has become relatively dim.

The large number of binary stars and even multiple systems is notable. These star systems exhibit scales comparable in size to that of the solar system. Some, and perhaps many, of the nearby single stars have invisible (or very dim) companions detectable by their gravitational effects on the primary star; this orbital motion of the unseen member causes the visible star to “wobble” in its motion through space. Some of the invisible companions have been found to have masses on the order of 0.001 solar mass or less, which is in the range of planetary rather than stellar dimensions. Current observations suggest that they are genuine planets, though some are merely extremely dim stars (sometimes called brown dwarfs). Nonetheless, a reasonable inference that can be drawn from these data is that double stars and planetary systems are formed by similar evolutionary processes.

Citations

MLA Style:

"star." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2008. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 21 Aug. 2008 <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/563395/star>.

APA Style:

star. (2008). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved August 21, 2008, from Encyclopædia Britannica Online: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/563395/star

star

Link to this article and share the full text with the readers of your Web site or blog-post.

If you think a reference to this article on "star" will enhance your Web site, blog-post, or any other web-content, then feel free to link to this article, and your readers will gain full access to the full article, even if they do not subscribe to our service.

You may want to use the HTML code fragment provided below.

We welcome your comments. Any revisions or updates suggested for this article will be reviewed by our editorial staff. Contact us here.

Regular users of Britannica may notice that this comments feature is less robust than in the past. This is only temporary, while we make the transition to a dramatically new and richer site. The functionality of the system will be restored soon.

Audio/Video

JavaScript and Adobe Flash version 9 or higher is required to view this content. You can download Flash here:
http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer